<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rssdatehelper="urn:rssdatehelper"><channel><title>BlogFodder comment feed for Simple Umbraco Footer Navigation</title><link>http://www.blogfodder.co.uk</link><pubDate></pubDate><generator>umbraco</generator><description>General techie &amp; development ramblings, source code and random other things</description><language>en</language><item><title>
          Re Simple Umbraco Footer Navigation by Rob</title><link>http://www.blogfodder.co.uk/2009/10/21/simple-umbraco-footer-navigation#comment-170</link><pubDate></pubDate><guid>http://www.blogfodder.co.uk/2009/10/21/simple-umbraco-footer-navigation#comment-170</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ What this is missing is a way to control the order that the links appear!]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>
          Re Simple Umbraco Footer Navigation by Lee</title><link>http://www.blogfodder.co.uk/2009/10/21/simple-umbraco-footer-navigation#comment-37</link><pubDate></pubDate><guid>http://www.blogfodder.co.uk/2009/10/21/simple-umbraco-footer-navigation#comment-37</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ Hi Tim - Thanks for commenting, and you are right thats also a good idea :)  I went with this option as people will be using the umbracoNaviHide option in CWS so made sense (To me anyway lol) to add the footer option just under it.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>
          Re Simple Umbraco Footer Navigation by Tim</title><link>http://www.blogfodder.co.uk/2009/10/21/simple-umbraco-footer-navigation#comment-36</link><pubDate></pubDate><guid>http://www.blogfodder.co.uk/2009/10/21/simple-umbraco-footer-navigation#comment-36</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ nice idea! you could also have a footer doctype with a single ultimate picker which points at the root of your site structure, which would allow you to pick and choose which items you want in your footer. Easier to administer moving forward no? rather than to have to go into each document and check a checkbox for each.]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>
